From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Jul 29 2:16:19 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from axl.noc.iafrica.com (axl.noc.iafrica.com [196.31.1.175]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BF0B15595 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 1999 02:16:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sheldonh@axl.noc.iafrica.com) Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.noc.iafrica.com) by axl.noc.iafrica.com with local-esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 119mGa-000As0-00; Thu, 29 Jul 1999 11:14:20 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn To: Josef Karthauser Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Mentioning RFC numbers in /etc/services In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 29 Jul 1999 09:04:20 +0100." <19990729090420.A98489@pavilion.net> Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 11:14:20 +0200 Message-ID: <41787.933239660@axl.noc.iafrica.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 29 Jul 1999 09:04:20 +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote: > A question that always baffled me (I'm fairly easy to baffle) is why > we've got some numbers defined as both udp and tcp when the service > type is only one or the other. Does anyone know? Probably because this question isn't accompanied by a list of offenders. :-) By the way, I originally said I'd have this done in a week. I can only imagine how many of the die-hards giggled in the background, since it involves quite a bit of reading. And then there are all the useful suggestions I've received. Let's leave this alone until I have diffs to show y'all? Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message