From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Mar  9 00:12:36 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA08605
          for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Mon, 9 Mar 1998 00:12:36 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA08457
          for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 9 Mar 1998 00:12:05 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.6.9) with ESMTP id AAA26589; Mon, 9 Mar 1998 00:10:54 -0800 (PST)
To: Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no>
cc: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: *HEADS UP* Important change warning. (long version) 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 09 Mar 1998 08:45:16 +0100."
             <19980309084516.43988@follo.net> 
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 1998 00:10:54 -0800
Message-ID: <26586.889431054@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@FreeBSD.ORG>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

> Wasn't the policy here that we were to remain 'binary compatible'
> within RELENG_2_2 - ie, no changes that need userland rebuild should
> go into 2.2?  Alex caught quite a bit of flak over changing the IPFW
> binary interface in RELENG_2_2 IIRC?

I think that a change to /etc/fstab sort of falls outside the issue of
binary compatability.  Besides, if you knew of the hacks that can now
be removed as a result of this change, you'd applaud! :)

					Jordan

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message