Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2007 00:18:29 +0100 From: Pawel Worach <pawel.worach@gmail.com> To: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [Call for Testers] ACPI-CA 20071114 Message-ID: <473E2545.30504@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200711161801.53513.jkim@FreeBSD.org> References: <200711161338.54270.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <473E0EA6.1070904@gmail.com> <200711161801.53513.jkim@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jung-uk Kim wrote: > On Friday 16 November 2007 04:41 pm, Pawel Worach wrote: >> Jung-uk Kim wrote: >>> Please test the following patch on -CURRENT: >>> >>> http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/acpica-import-20071114.diff.gz >> Hi, >> >> Looks good here on a ThinkPad T60 except for a new LOR. >> >> acpi_ibm0: <IBM ThinkPad ACPI Extras> on acpi0 >> lock order reversal: (sleepable after non-sleepable) >> 1st 0xc083cb00 LED mtx (LED mtx) @ /usr/src/sys/dev/led/led.c:263 >> 2nd 0xc09cc304 ACPI IBM extras (ACPI IBM extras) @ >> /usr/src/sys/modules/acpi/acpi_ibm/../../../dev/acpi_support/acpi_i >> bm.c:311 KDB: stack backtrace: > > --- >8 --- SKIP --- >8 --- > > I have to admit that I haven't really tested anything under > sys/dev/acpi_support because I don't own any of these laptops. :-( > Anyway, can you test the following? > > --- sys/dev/acpi_support/acpi_ibm.c 25 Oct 2007 17:30:18 -0000 > +++ sys/dev/acpi_support/acpi_ibm.c 16 Nov 2007 22:43:39 -0000 > @@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ > sc->led_busy = 1; > sc->led_state = onoff; > > - AcpiOsExecute(OSL_NOTIFY_HANDLER, (void *)ibm_led_task, sc); > + acpi_queue_task(OSL_NOTIFY_HANDLER, (void *)ibm_led_task, sc); > } > > static void > Yes, that fixed the LOR, thanks! -- Pawel
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?473E2545.30504>