From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 17 07:07:35 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 521A7106566B; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 07:07:35 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 07:07:35 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Matthias Andree Message-ID: <20110317070735.GA50416@FreeBSD.org> References: <201103170003.p2H03lCu061081@repoman.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201103170003.p2H03lCu061081@repoman.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/sysutils/gpart Makefile distinfo ports/sysutils/gpart/files patch-ae patch-af X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 07:07:35 -0000 On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 12:03:47AM +0000, Matthias Andree wrote: > mandree 2011-03-17 00:03:47 UTC > > Modified files: > sysutils/gpart Makefile distinfo > Added files: > sysutils/gpart/files patch-ae patch-af > Log: > First round of amd64 fixes. Compiles and detects BSD partitions, but > may require work for NTFS, NTFS5, or other partitions. [...] > > Revision Changes Path > 1.16 +7 -6 ports/sysutils/gpart/Makefile > 1.9 +0 -1 ports/sysutils/gpart/distinfo > 1.1 +34 -0 ports/sysutils/gpart/files/patch-ae (new) > 1.1 +96 -0 ports/sysutils/gpart/files/patch-af (new) Perhaps you could explain why did you decide to go with legacy patch naming scheme when it is clearly advised to be avoided by PH? ./danfe