From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 5 18:25:10 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E65891065677 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 18:25:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jfvogel@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A0A68FC16 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 18:25:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwc9 with SMTP id 9so2131974qwc.13 for ; Thu, 05 May 2011 11:25:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=WVajPLza1MEr6H+w6TZ3IBnJEEd9mdaKUeFZWDAXJBs=; b=YHJ4ZuqbpDDjVAD78eLNWFnASzUjjWnaSj0X0AW6d8WEnYygqti49T+d9X5qBJYgk8 M92Eqc/FCJxzrHF9McbnDfeKV1QQcQbk82GmnbexWOs0v8b6uYU+HTSrdv41wGaixauL oHXHu1PSdhBwPCaCry4U9LnGX+gIy4RVX81t4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=acarHZJIds0n0JW86kqQ9dgSgA0ICZKmmE63jNJehIuvrViXoorzLZXiUUN/mBmkIa xijwlL0KEPq8tAkf5Qf/sngR9wo5jmabDSZ+HLbLM+9Z4/5zTrzCQhZY1hObN2+/66vC 2ukzhyvZS1Lop5mQl+bNzoljpGX042E+B/dl8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.112.227 with SMTP id it3mr476453vdb.84.1304619909527; Thu, 05 May 2011 11:25:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.184.169 with HTTP; Thu, 5 May 2011 11:25:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4D94A354.9080903@sentex.net> <4DC07013.9070707@gmx.net> <4DC078BD.9080908@gmx.net> Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 11:25:09 -0700 Message-ID: From: Jack Vogel To: Olivier Smedts Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD current mailing list , Arnaud Lacombe Subject: Re: problems with em(4) since update to driver 7.2.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 May 2011 18:25:11 -0000 Not sure, I wondered if those seeing this had some special sequence of actions they took for granted that is different than what we do in house... In any case, the init really is ultimately a correctness thing, so let's just call it good :) Jack On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Olivier Smedts wrote: > 2011/5/5 Jack Vogel : > > Anyway, I see the problematic code path, its only when > > you skip the while loop altogether. I'm surprised the compiler > > did not complain about this, its usually so anal. > > Could it be related to the compiler (clang) or some optimization flags ? > > -- > Olivier Smedts _ > ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) > e-mail: olivier@gid0.org - against HTML email & vCards X > www: http://www.gid0.org - against proprietary attachments / \ > > "Il y a seulement 10 sortes de gens dans le monde : > ceux qui comprennent le binaire, > et ceux qui ne le comprennent pas." >