From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 20 20:43:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C3F016A4DF for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 20:43:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz) Received: from eva.fit.vutbr.cz (eva.fit.vutbr.cz [147.229.10.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BA0C43D5C for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 20:43:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz) Received: from eva.fit.vutbr.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eva.fit.vutbr.cz (envelope-from xdivac02@eva.fit.vutbr.cz) (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id k7KKhd1A076969 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 20 Aug 2006 22:43:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from xdivac02@localhost) by eva.fit.vutbr.cz (8.13.7/8.13.3/Submit) id k7KKhdT6076968; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 22:43:39 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 22:43:39 +0200 From: Divacky Roman To: Paul Mather Message-ID: <20060820204338.GA76869@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> References: <1156096970.19717.12.camel@zappa.Chelsea-Ct.Org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1156096970.19717.12.camel@zappa.Chelsea-Ct.Org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.54 on 147.229.10.14 Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Linuxulator: syscall statfs64 not implemented? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 20:43:46 -0000 On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 02:02:50PM -0400, Paul Mather wrote: > Since updating my -CURRENT system circa 16th August I'm getting an error > like this when my daily Tivoli backup runs: > > Aug 20 02:18:50 zappa kernel: linux: pid 768 (dsmc): syscall statfs64 not implemented > > I don't know whether this is a -CURRENT problem or a problem with > linux_base-fc4, but I lean towards the former because the same nightly > backup setup I'm running on a 6.1-STABLE system runs without problems. > > I recall a discussion about merging Linux 2.6 kernel support into HEAD > around the time I updated. Could this be related to that? Here is what > I have for my Linux compat sysctls: > > compat.linux.oss_version: 198144 > compat.linux.osrelease: 2.4.2 > compat.linux.osname: Linux > > Is anyone else having this "syscall statfs64 not implemented" problem? yes, everyone. statfs64 syscalls is not implemented. I might implement if its important and you are willing to test. it should be quite trivial but I need the testing. roman