Date: Thu, 11 Dec 1997 10:50:03 +0100 From: Pierre.Beyssac@hsc.fr (Pierre Beyssac) To: tlambert@primenet.com (Terry Lambert) Cc: jamil@acroal.com (J. Weatherbee - Senior Systems Architect), jasone@canonware.com, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: OS Ports Message-ID: <19971211105003.AB51394@mars.hsc.fr> In-Reply-To: <199712110017.RAA29759@usr02.primenet.com>; from Terry Lambert on Dec 11, 1997 00:17:49 %2B0000 References: <Pine.BSF.3.96.971210155638.25636B-100000@acroal.com> <199712110017.RAA29759@usr02.primenet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
According to Terry Lambert: > > emulator, I.E. 68330, 68331, 68332, 68F33, 68334, 68336, 68340, 68341, > > 68349, or 68360 emulator. Simply because I have some very good > > familiarity with the 68hc11 series. And the 68300's are actually still > > AFAIK, there's no NetBSD (for example) for the processors you list. There probably never will: the 68hc11 series are just souped-up 6800-based microcontrollers with extended instruction set. Very easy to find in France because they're used in a popular, uh, video converter. I've seen a port of gcc for these but have never actually tried it. There are also several assemblers and emulators running under Unix, some of them are even in the -ports collection I seem to recall. On the other hand, there are at least two 68K emulators that I know of: one of them in MAME, the other in the Amiga emulator I forgot the name of. Maybe they're based on the same code. They're written in portable C and though AFAIK they don't emulate the 68030/68040 they're probably a good starting point for this. -- Pierre.Beyssac@hsc.fr
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19971211105003.AB51394>