From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 7 19:06:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCDDA106566B for ; Sat, 7 Mar 2009 19:06:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@vlk.vlakno.cz) Received: from vlakno.cz (77-93-215-190.static.masterinter.net [77.93.215.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 991DC8FC15 for ; Sat, 7 Mar 2009 19:06:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@vlk.vlakno.cz) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 235EE9CB090 for ; Sat, 7 Mar 2009 20:06:26 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at vlakno.cz Received: from vlakno.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lev.vlakno.cz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SDeGnBf7-y7u for ; Sat, 7 Mar 2009 20:06:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from vlk.vlakno.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AB099CB1B9 for ; Sat, 7 Mar 2009 20:06:20 +0100 (CET) Received: (from rdivacky@localhost) by vlk.vlakno.cz (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n27J6KZ3046742 for arch@FreeBSD.ORG; Sat, 7 Mar 2009 20:06:20 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rdivacky) Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 20:06:20 +0100 From: Roman Divacky To: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Message-ID: <20090307190620.GA45956@freebsd.org> References: <20090307103138.GA34456@zim.MIT.EDU> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090307103138.GA34456@zim.MIT.EDU> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Subject: Re: C99 inlines X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2009 19:06:33 -0000 On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 05:31:38AM -0500, David Schultz wrote: > I'd like the gcc in our tree to use the C99 semantics instead of GNU > semantics for inline functions in C99 and GNU99 mode. The following > patch implements this behavior. It is based on a snapshot of the gcc > 4.3 branch from March 2007, prior to the GPLv3 switch. I definitely support this... thnx for working on it!