From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 21 12:58:05 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3288516A4CE; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 12:58:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nagual.pp.ru (pobrecita.freebsd.ru [194.87.13.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66D4E43D58; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 12:58:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: from nagual.pp.ru (ache@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nagual.pp.ru (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j0LCw3xU095533; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 15:58:03 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: (from ache@localhost) by nagual.pp.ru (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j0LCw26m095532; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 15:58:02 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache) Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 15:58:02 +0300 From: Andrey Chernov To: Matthias Andree Message-ID: <20050121125801.GA94152@nagual.pp.ru> Mail-Followup-To: Andrey Chernov , Matthias Andree , Joerg Wunsch , current@FreeBSD.ORG, bde@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20050120192324.GA30862@uriah.heep.sax.de> <20050120205501.GA69123@nagual.pp.ru> <20050120211449.GC30862@uriah.heep.sax.de> <20050120214406.GA70088@nagual.pp.ru> <20050120222137.GE30862@uriah.heep.sax.de> <20050121000916.GA73235@nagual.pp.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir Milter (version: 1.1.0-3; AVE: 6.29.0.8; VDF: 6.29.0.73; host: nagual.pp.ru) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.6 (nagual.pp.ru [0.0.0.0]); Fri, 21 Jan 2005 15:58:03 +0300 (MSK) cc: Joerg Wunsch cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG cc: bde@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Implementation errors in strtol() X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 12:58:05 -0000 On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 11:15:34AM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote: > Is not SUS v3 == "POSIX" 2001 edition (IEEE Std 1003.1-2001)? Yes, with two technical corrigendum, as I read their announce. But Joerg mention older SUSv2 and I mean it too. As I just found, they makes SUSv3 searcheable and browseable in the HTML form. All that needed is just registration at http://www.unix.org/single_unix_specification/ BTW, back to the subj, their text about strtol() is equal to POSIX, so both POSIX and SUSv3 finally agrees. Back yo your question about contradictions, I found explaining quote: "Extension to the ISO C standard The functionality described is an extension to the ISO C standard. Application writers may make use of an extension as it is supported on all IEEE Std 1003.1-2001-conforming systems. With each function or header from the ISO C standard, a statement to the effect that ``any conflict is unintentional'' is included. That is intended to refer to a direct conflict. IEEE Std 1003.1-2001 acts in part as a profile of the ISO C standard, and it may choose to further constrain behaviors allowed to vary by the ISO C standard. Such limitations are not considered conflicts. Where additional semantics apply to a function or header, the material is identified by use of the CX margin legend." -- http://ache.pp.ru/