From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 25 11:15:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74ED616A4CE for ; Tue, 25 May 2004 11:15:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.wcborstel.nl (node-c-0ab6.a2000.nl [62.194.10.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE8A843D2D for ; Tue, 25 May 2004 11:15:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jorn@wcborstel.nl) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [172.16.1.4]) by www.wcborstel.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82D1A83E7; Tue, 25 May 2004 20:16:38 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <40B38D3E.2090107@wcborstel.nl> Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 20:15:26 +0200 From: Jorn Argelo User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (Windows/20040502) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chuck Swiger References: <40B38735.8080609@wcborstel.nl> <40B389E7.5070607@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <40B389E7.5070607@mac.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd Questions Subject: Re: Strange pkg_info output X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 18:15:50 -0000 Chuck Swiger wrote: > Jorn Argelo wrote: > >> Recently I came across something which kind of bothered me. Every >> time when pkg_info removes and/or registers a package it gives this >> output: >> >> pkg_info: package bsdpan-DBD-mysql-2.9003 has no origin recorded >> pkg_info: package bsdpan-DBI-1.42 has no origin recorded >> pkg_info: package bsdpan-GD-1.19 has no origin recorded > > > I've seen the same type of messages either when updating a Perl module > using CPAN, or now when using perl-5.8.4 (via local modification to > the port). > >> Should I be worried about this? Or, how do I fix this? > > > The messages are annoying but mostly harmless. I suspect that the > package dependency information is no longer reliable, however, but if > you are already updating Perl software past the versions currently in > the ports repository, hopefully you know what you are doing. :-) No, I won't. I always build everything from the ports-tree. > > I would be interested in a fix for this as well, however. > Thanks for your reply. Cheers, Jorn