From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org  Sat Dec 23 16:50:25 2017
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46028E87594
 for <freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Sat, 23 Dec 2017 16:50:25 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de)
Received: from ms-10.1blu.de (ms-10.1blu.de [178.254.4.101])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 055F86ADAD
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Sat, 23 Dec 2017 16:50:23 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de)
Received: from [89.204.135.157] (helo=[10.157.219.157])
 by ms-10.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from <guru@unixarea.de>) id 1eSn02-0002Nv-Qu
 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sat, 23 Dec 2017 17:50:14 +0100
From: Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de>
To: <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Procmail got updated!
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2017 17:50:13 +0100
User-Agent: Dekko/0.6.20; Qt/5.4.1; ubuntumirclient; Linux; 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <64a0ce8f-8f1f-45bf-8024-95b7324e2d14@unixarea.de>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.20.1712231032270.60984@io-tx.com>
References: <alpine.BSF.2.21.1712181012470.92288@aneurin.horsfall.org>
 <a3a1097d-22c7-89cc-dd69-b4ceeebf7228@gmx.de>
 <alpine.BSF.2.20.1712181824220.10261@io-tx.com>
 <f68594db-396b-0821-e90d-3f089781e8fd@gmx.de> <5A39F7C9.1030800@grosbein.net>
 <05504d3c-3225-e83f-8f10-225319421a35@gmx.de>
 <B51F1354-44C9-4936-A78B-84F34A4516B5@adamw.org>
 <f02e8c58-4fc5-6fd9-ed06-02e3077e67e8@gmx.de> <5A3B7BFF.2020202@grosbein.net>
 <845b162a-918d-4a5f-c3c2-4f58b60bff73@gmx.de> <5A3CA1B5.2090907@grosbein.net>
 <a24e3a36-7c23-47a1-acfc-74d76a9d2e5f@gmx.de>
 <CAN6yY1uvdK4NvzgG8w5KTgiGEG4D3d6GLmo-yXdZpBAeXCi0Yw@mail.gmail.com>
 <1f5623f9-0ed1-3fb7-d81a-efd2f08ae3c8@gmx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Con-Id: 51246
X-Con-U: 0-guru
X-Originating-IP: 89.204.135.157
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2017 16:50:25 -0000

On Saturday, 23 December 2017 17:42:26 CET, Ted Hatfield <ted@io-tx.com>=20
wrote:
>=20
> ...
>
> I think that as long as someone is willing to patch the software when=20
> vulnerabilities come up we should keep the port available.
>
> Ted Hatfield

+1

matthias



--=20
Sent from my Ubuntu phone
http://www.unixarea.de/