Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 14:39:01 -0700 From: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> To: Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com> Cc: tjr@FreeBSD.ORG, sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu, phk@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Who broke sort(1) ? Message-ID: <20020924213901.57E202A894@canning.wemm.org> In-Reply-To: <200209242043.NAA26380@windsor.research.att.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bill Fenner wrote:
>
> Here's my suggested fix:
> @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
> +/*
> + * Tell GNU sort(1) to implement the obsolete +1 -0 syntax even though
> + * it has been removed from the version of POSIX that the rest of
> + * the system conforms to.
> + */
> +int posix2_version(void) {
> + return 0;
> +}
Try something like this:
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
int
posix2_version(void)
{
if (getenv("POSIX_ME_HARDER") || getenv("POSIXLY_CORRECT"))
return _POSIX2_VERSION;
else
return 0;
}
Cheers,
-Peter
--
Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com
"All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020924213901.57E202A894>