From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 6 09:43:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE7AD16A41F; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 09:43:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at [128.131.111.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45D5243D46; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 09:43:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from [128.131.111.48] (pulcherrima [128.131.111.48]) by vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE3D113788; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 11:43:35 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 11:43:34 +0200 (CEST) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Alexander Leidinger In-Reply-To: <20050904185122.29cc5e11@Magellan.Leidinger.net> Message-ID: References: <200509032046.j83KkpQL082427@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050904124420.545395cb@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <20050904171849.21d7613c.jylefort@FreeBSD.org> <20050904185122.29cc5e11@Magellan.Leidinger.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Jean-Yves Lefort , cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, alejandro@varnet.biz, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/games Makefile ports/games/linux-ut2003-demo Makefile distinfo pkg-descr ports/games/linux-ut2003-demo/files ut2003-demo.in X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 09:43:37 -0000 On Sun, 4 Sep 2005, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > We had a discussion on ports@ a while ago: As long as there are no very > urgent reasons to use a install-time generated plist a maintainer > should (as in: we point with fingers on you if you don't do it) use a > static plist since it is more beneficial for most people. I've been maintaining a static plist for the emulators/wine port, and usually accounts for about one third an update of that port takes me (in terms of manual work, not automated testing), but it's managable. Better tools, like David O'Brien asked for, certainly would be nice. Gerald