Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 00:25:33 +1100 From: andrew clarke <mail@ozzmosis.com> To: "Kevin P. Neal" <kpn@neutralgood.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check Message-ID: <20171126132532.f27hlvtnyjnkq7rr@ozzmosis.com> In-Reply-To: <20171126032013.GA46813@neutralgood.org> References: <nycvar.OFS.7.76.1711250853410.73766@eboyr.pbz> <20171126032013.GA46813@neutralgood.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat 2017-11-25 22:20:13 UTC-0500, Kevin P. Neal (kpn@neutralgood.org) wrote: > Is that the consensus to replace use of procmail with maildrop? > > A little googling makes it look like maildrop has the easy integration > with sendmail just like procmail. But is maildrop going to be around for > the next, oh, 20 years like procmail was? maildrop began circa 1999 and is part of the Courier Mail Server software. procmail began circa 1990. Arguably both are due for a modern replacement, although at least maildrop does not suffer from vulnerabilities, afaik. I migrated from procmail to maildrop a few years ago. My only real gripe with it is that it doesn't create Maildir subdirectories automatically, so you have to call 'maildirmake' from within each filter rule (but only if the subdirectory doesn't already exist!) making each maildroprc filter more complicated than necessary.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20171126132532.f27hlvtnyjnkq7rr>