Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1999 14:16:06 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@ucb.crimea.ua> To: Thomas Uhrfelt <thomas.uhrfelt@plymovent.se> Cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: IP-in-IP encapsulation Message-ID: <19990810141606.A13407@relay.ucb.crimea.ua> In-Reply-To: <LOBBJNJHKFOGCKJFKEKBMEJPCDAA.thomas.uhrfelt@plymovent.se>; from Thomas Uhrfelt on Tue, Aug 10, 1999 at 11:44:16AM %2B0200 References: <19990810104405.B50549@relay.ucb.crimea.ua> <LOBBJNJHKFOGCKJFKEKBMEJPCDAA.thomas.uhrfelt@plymovent.se>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Aug 10, 1999 at 11:44:16AM +0200, Thomas Uhrfelt wrote: > Well if somebody got a good sollution (besides PPP) that works good, I want > to hear about it. I tried SKIP but somehow it doesnt work well with the fxp > driver. Right now I am using PPP with the -ddial option, but links go down > anyway and don't re-initiate themselves. And the <add!> clause in ppp doesnt > seem to do its job properly by reassigning routes when the tun# interface > change. > > So please give me a buzz when you find a working sollution. > > Regards, > > Thomas Uhrfelt - nos-tun(8) (available as /sbin/nos-tun) uses IPIP (94) encapsulation and tun(4) interface - tund(8) (available as ports/net/tund) uses IP-over-UDP encapsulation and divert(4)/ipfw(8) mixture - http://www.ucb.crimea.ua/~ru/FreeBSD/iptunnel/ Almost the same IP-over-UDP tunnel. -- Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA of the ru@ucb.crimea.ua United Commercial Bank, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, +380.652.247.647 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990810141606.A13407>