From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Oct 31 03:51:21 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id DAA22604 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 31 Oct 1996 03:51:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from eel.dataplex.net (eel.dataplex.net [208.2.87.2]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id DAA22594 for <questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 31 Oct 1996 03:51:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from [208.2.87.4] (cod [208.2.87.4]) by eel.dataplex.net (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id FAA23901; Thu, 31 Oct 1996 05:50:28 -0600 (CST) X-Sender: rkw@mail.dataplex.net Message-Id: <l03010600ae9e3f5d3416@[208.2.87.4]> In-Reply-To: <3278806D.2FA6@degnet.baynet.de> References: <326DFE77.549B@degnet.baynet.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Thu, 31 Oct 1996 05:47:39 -0600 To: moos@degnet.baynet.de From: Richard Wackerbarth <rkw@dataplex.net> Subject: Re: Is this network possible with FreeBSD ??? Cc: questions@freebsd.org Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >I have tried them all and they did NOT work !!! AS I HAVE SAID BEFORE. LOOK AT THE ROUTER! You, for some unknown reason, expect the FreeBSD box to fix a problem in the routing tables at the router. You have already admitted that you can go from 1.2.3.253 to the outside world. Now configure the router so that it can take care of the 1.2.3 network. A packet arriving from ANY address should be router toward the proper destination. The FreeBSD box thinks that ALL 1.2.3 addresses are on its ethernet. The ROUTER must make that true. The best solution is to have adajacent IP addresses for the FreeBSD box and the Router and then use a netmask of 0xfffffffc. As an alternative IN THE ROUTER, have it arp for the 1.2.3 addresses that you wish to have visable to the FreeBSD box. I'm sorry, but I am getting very tired of your attitude that it is the fault of the FreeBSD box. Fix the f*cking router and quit blaming the FreeBSD box.