From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 8 19:30:42 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C7EF16A420 for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 19:30:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1smout1.broadpark.no (osl1smout1.broadpark.no [80.202.4.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D29843D68 for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 19:30:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1sminn1.broadpark.no ([80.202.4.59]) by osl1smout1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IR70045W2E47M80@osl1smout1.broadpark.no> for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 20:34:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from kg-work.kg4.no ([80.203.92.30]) by osl1sminn1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with SMTP id <0IR700A3J2BJHDS4@osl1sminn1.broadpark.no> for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 20:33:19 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 20:30:33 +0100 From: Torfinn Ingolfsen X-Face: "t9w2,-X@O^I`jVW\sonI3.,36KBLZE*AL[y9lL[PyFD*r_S:dIL9c[8Y>V42R0"!"yb_zN,f#%.[PYYNq; m"_0v; ~rUM2Yy!zmkh)3&U|u!=T(zyv,MHJv"nDH>OJ`t(@mil461d_B'Uo|'nMwlKe0Mv=kvV?Nh@>Hb<3s_z2jYgZhPb@?Wi^x1a~Hplz1.zH In-reply-to: <43983204.9080609@fer.hr> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-id: <20051208203033.3b56ebe4.torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.6 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <20051208001857.68ac4fef.torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no> <43983204.9080609@fer.hr> Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.0 as storage server with raid5? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 19:30:42 -0000 On Thu, 08 Dec 2005 14:15:48 +0100 Ivan Voras wrote: > You could use graid3(8) - it has data+parity components like raid5. What about write performance? Based on RAID3 documentation I have read (on the 'net, so I cannot vouch for the correctness of it), you will get worse write performance than with RAID5. Does anybody have some real numbers here? > I've been using it for more than a year now and didn't have problems > with it. Didn't have to try recovery from a dead disk also, but > should work ok. I would prefer a firsthand "crash" report that tells what happened, and a step-by-step "here's how I fixed it" guide, but ok. :-) -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen, Norway