From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 7 13:21:53 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7478516A40F for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 13:21:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E207D13C469 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 13:21:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from working (c-71-60-174-60.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [71.60.174.60]) (AUTH: LOGIN wmoran, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Sun, 07 Jan 2007 08:21:51 -0500 id 0005642D.45A0F3EF.00016771 Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 08:21:50 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: Tek Bahadur Limbu Message-Id: <20070107082150.deb1e14c.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <20070107173107.9dc3702a.teklimbu@wlink.com.np> References: <20070107173107.9dc3702a.teklimbu@wlink.com.np> Organization: Collaborative Fusion Inc. X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.10 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeRadius 1.1.3 segmentation problem in Freebsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 13:21:53 -0000 Tek Bahadur Limbu wrote: > > Dear All, > > Just today, I have installed FreeRadius 1.1.3 from FreeBSD 6.0 (i386) > ports. I am posting this question in FreeBSD mailing list. I am finding > it hard to run FreeRadius on my FreeBSD 6.0 machine. > > Could the following segmentation fault be a FreeBSD issue? > > > I am following this material from: > http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/excerpt/radius_5/index1.html Try installing from the port instead. -Bill