From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Mar 21 10:20:20 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 602C3106566B;
	Mon, 21 Mar 2011 10:20:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@e.0x20.net)
Received: from mail.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [217.69.67.217])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 251938FC16;
	Mon, 21 Mar 2011 10:20:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail.0x20.net (Postfix, from userid 1002)
	id 71E2C36C8E; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:04:28 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:04:28 +0100
From: Lars Engels <lars.engels@0x20.net>
To: Michael Reifenberger <mike@reifenberger.com>
Message-ID: <20110321100428.GN90300@e.0x20.net>
References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1103210906001.48840@gw.reifenberger.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Wh9K+VmLHGaPX0mq"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1103210906001.48840@gw.reifenberger.com>
X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 7.2
X-Operation-System: FreeBSD 5.5-RELEASE-p19
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: Nathan Whitehorn <nwhitehorn@FreeBSD.org>,
	FreeBSD-Current <current@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: bsdinstall-amd64-20110313 remarks
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 10:20:20 -0000


--Wh9K+VmLHGaPX0mq
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 09:25:36AM +0100, Michael Reifenberger wrote:
> Hi,
> yesterday I tested the images listed in the subject and have the followin=
g=20
> remarks:
>=20
> - At least the memstick image contains an empty fstab
> - Does the usage of a "dangerously dedikated disklabel" give any advantag=
e?
> - The usage of an UFS-Label for root mounting should be more flexible
- UFS-labeling does not work

I let bsdinstall partition the disk automatically and edited the
proposed partitions to add labels, but after the first boot, neither
fstab nor /dev/label showed any labels.

--Wh9K+VmLHGaPX0mq
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAk2HIqwACgkQKc512sD3afizbQCeLSAjZNT4uB69h7YzQoSPiUOY
KBEAn3MS+v+Y+Zk/BXhN7YQUc2+u65zA
=u0GI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Wh9K+VmLHGaPX0mq--