Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 8 Oct 2005 11:14:10 +0300
From:      Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com>
To:        Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Another administrative variable: NOFETCHFILES
Message-ID:  <20051008111410.45d3d137@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
In-Reply-To: <20051008021430.GC1278@k7.mavetju>
References:  <20051008003731.GA3447@k7.mavetju> <20051008042002.2fa80dd4@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <20051008021430.GC1278@k7.mavetju>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 8 Oct 2005 12:14:30 +1000
Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org> wrote:

> On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 04:20:02AM +0300, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> > > If there was a variable, for example NOFETCHFILES a la
> > > IGNOREFILES, port survey tools could keep this in mind, and the
> > > output of "fetch-all-list" (or "fetch-list") would be more
> > > reliable too.
> > 
> > The problem I see here is that I would like o continue to be able to
> > use mi local mirror to fetch from this type of files for the other
> > machines.
> 
> Maybe it should displayed when using MASTER_SITE_OVERRIDE, but not
> with a normal MASTER_SITES?

Sounds OK.


-- 
IOnut
Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
  "Intellectual Property" is   nowhere near as valuable   as "Intellect"





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051008111410.45d3d137>