From owner-freebsd-chat Thu Feb 17 16:38:18 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mail.enteract.com (mail.enteract.com [207.229.143.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24EDF37B89C for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2000 16:38:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dscheidt@enteract.com) Received: from shell-3.enteract.com (dscheidt@shell-3.enteract.com [207.229.143.42]) by mail.enteract.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id SAA45342; Thu, 17 Feb 2000 18:36:48 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dscheidt@enteract.com) Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2000 18:36:48 -0600 (CST) From: David Scheidt To: Brad Knowles Cc: Brett Taylor , Jonathon McKitrick , Jonathon McKitrick , chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: BSD vs Linux comments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, 18 Feb 2000, Brad Knowles wrote: > At 6:28 PM -0500 2000/2/17, Brett Taylor wrote: > > > Linux has problems w/ LOTS of memory as I recall > > Yeah, I think anything over 2GB is still a real problem. The 2.3 kernel is supposed to be able to handle 4GB, but I don't have a machine to test with. > last I checked, although Matt had fixed the NFS itself, we still > didn't have a functional lockd, so I'm not sure we should be casting > stones on this. Keep up. Things move fast around here! Thanks to David Cross and someone else at RPI, there is one for 4.0. I don't know how well it works, but it has to be better than the one in the system already. Daivd To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message