Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 09:33:15 +0900 (JST) From: Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org> To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com> Cc: nork@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/75491: mail/dspam: fix deinstall; fix comment; bug-fixes; update Message-ID: <200412260033.iBQ0XFLB031919@sakura.ninth-nine.com> In-Reply-To: <20041225223124.2c8186cb@it.buh.tecnik93.com> References: <200412251241.iBPCfre1033487@freefall.freebsd.org> <20041225223124.2c8186cb@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 25 Dec 2004 22:31:24 +0200 Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com> wrote: > > Synopsis: mail/dspam: fix deinstall; fix comment; bug-fixes; update > > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed > > State-Changed-By: nork > > State-Changed-When: Sat Dec 25 12:41:42 GMT 2004 > > State-Changed-Why: > > Committed, thanks! > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=75491 > -PORTREVISION=1 > +PORTREVISION=0 > Why 0 ? I mean isn't it redundant ? According to ports handbook(*), I consider that PORTREVISION should be reset to 0 rather than removing PORTREVISION. But PORTREVISION=0 is same as no PORTREVISION. And to be sure, it is not necessarily clearly shown by ports handbook. (*) http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/makefile-naming.html#MAKEFILE-NAMING-REVEPOCH > And you own my a lamb ( just a custom here if one misnames a person :-) ) > Submitted by: on-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com> (maintainer) > ^^^^^^ > Ion-Mihai Oh my god. I missed. Sorry.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200412260033.iBQ0XFLB031919>