From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Dec 30 3:50: 3 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46AA015104 for ; Thu, 30 Dec 1999 03:50:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id DAA54935; Thu, 30 Dec 1999 03:50:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Thu, 30 Dec 1999 03:50:02 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199912301150.DAA54935@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Seth Bromberger Subject: Re: ports/15765: mutt 1.0i port fails Reply-To: Seth Bromberger Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/15765; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Seth Bromberger To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, seth@freebie.dp.ny.frb.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/15765: mutt 1.0i port fails Date: Thu, 30 Dec 1999 06:41:34 -0500 Update: Mutt was trying to link against older ncurses libs in /usr/lib (don't know how they got there; they were v3). Problem resolved by removing the ncurses libs installed in /usr/lib and symlinking to /usr/local/lib (since the Makefile didn't incude /usr/local/lib in its linker search path). I still don't know why I've seen this on 3 diff. systems... is asome version of ncurses installed in /usr/lib by default? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message