Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 23 Aug 2012 16:26:21 +0100
From:      Steve O'Hara-Smith <steve@sohara.org>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: implications of adding root to a group
Message-ID:  <20120823162621.ae92b733.steve@sohara.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAK0Kb5FfcKzjOoLLwM%2BTX%2BZ17ZBC-gVSBUtrZNF7Ufpxk1c7FA@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAK0Kb5FfcKzjOoLLwM%2BTX%2BZ17ZBC-gVSBUtrZNF7Ufpxk1c7FA@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 07:51:10 -0700
Krims G <krimskrims@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello, I've been looking at the /etc/group and have noticed that some
> groups have root included in them, for example "operator". Is it not
> implied that root has access to all things and groups? What is the purpose
> of adding root to a group? If I add root to some new arbitrary group, what
> does it result in differently than if I do not add root to that group?

	The root user has the ability to ignore file permissions, but not
the ability to subvert group membership tests in scripts or programs.

-- 
Steve O'Hara-Smith                          |   Directable Mirror Arrays
C:>WIN                                      | A better way to focus the sun
The computer obeys and wins.                |    licences available see
You lose and Bill collects.                 |    http://www.sohara.org/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120823162621.ae92b733.steve>