From owner-freebsd-current  Sun Sep 26 10:41:17 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from noop.colo.erols.net (noop.colo.erols.net [207.96.1.150])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B7AA15190
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Sep 1999 10:41:16 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gjp@noop.colo.erols.net)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=noop.colo.erols.net)
	by noop.colo.erols.net with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1)
	id 11VIJN-000Ghk-00; Sun, 26 Sep 1999 13:42:09 -0400
To: dmaddox@conterra.com
Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG
From: Gary Palmer <gjp@in-addr.com>
Subject: Re: Loss of Functionality with newpnp 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 26 Sep 1999 13:21:56 EDT."
             <19990926132156.B548@dmaddox.conterra.com> 
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 1999 13:42:09 -0400
Message-ID: <64215.938367729@noop.colo.erols.net>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

"Donald J . Maddox" wrote in message ID
<19990926132156.B548@dmaddox.conterra.com>:
> Ummm...  I'm not screaming anything, Gary.  The intent of my message is
> just to let the authors of this code know that it is *not* equal in
> functionality to what was removed.  As I said in my original message, it
> would be nice to see that functionality restored.

And how much time/resources are you willing to dedicate to restoration
of functionality *YOU* need?

> It may very well be that the authors are aware of this, and just don't
> give a damn.  I prefer to give them the benefit of the doubt.

They probably give a damn, but it goes a long way if you HELP them
rather than go around demanding stuff be put back.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message