From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 6 11:56:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 664) id 6293A16A4D0; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 11:56:00 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 11:56:00 -0800 From: David O'Brien To: Ryan Sommers Message-ID: <20040106195600.GA2432@hub.freebsd.org> References: <1072324229.662.18.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1072324229.662.18.camel@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE Organization: The NUXI BSD group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: EAI_NODATA redefined Patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 19:56:00 -0000 On Wed, Dec 24, 2003 at 09:50:29PM -0600, Ryan Sommers wrote: > Attached is a patch to get rid of the "EAI_NODATA redefined" errors in > buildworld. The Makefile lists no MAINTAINER but I know this is contrib > software. Should I submit this as a PR or who is the MAINTAINER? I think I have a different fix. I'm committing it now.