Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 19 May 2015 14:45:37 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 198888] net-mgmt/tcptrack FIX, upgrade 1.4.2 ==> 1.4.3, take MAINTAINER
Message-ID:  <bug-198888-13-74LXOA6SqV@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-198888-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-198888-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198888

--- Comment #3 from Chris Hutchinson <portmaster@bsdforge.com> ---
(In reply to Bartek Rutkowski from comment #2)
> Chris, few comments:
> 
> - have you taken ownership of that project? You've changed MASTER_SITES to
> point to your personal page, but the current upstream doesnt seem to have
> any 1.4.3 version. If you dont own the project, then doing something like
> that is not possible. You should stick to the upstream or fork the project
> and create new port for your own fork. 
> 
> - if you're doing PORTVERSION bump, then PORTREVISION, if exists, should be
> removed instead of bumped.

Well, I thought I did the right thing;
I fixed a bug in the source, and attempted to push the changes upstream.
But the last known contact: tcptrack2 @ s.rhythm.cx isn't valid
(s.rhythm.cx doesn't exist). So I simply bumped the version to
reflect the changes. Given rhythm.cx, nor www.rhythm.cx exist. I
opted to provide an informational web page for tcptrack.

I see now that mi@ disregarded this pr(1) and pushed a fix for this
some 8 wks. ago.
So maybe this was all just a waste of time. :(

Thank you very much, Bartek Rutkowski, for taking the time to
look at this.

--Chris

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-198888-13-74LXOA6SqV>