From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Nov 13 18:01:35 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 7AFEB16A4CE; Sat, 13 Nov 2004 18:01:35 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from smtp.owt.com (smtp.owt.com [204.118.6.19])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id F230F43D41; Sat, 13 Nov 2004 18:01:34 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from kstewart@owt.com)
Received: from [207.41.94.233] (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233])
	by smtp.owt.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id iADI0QLc027085;
	Sat, 13 Nov 2004 10:00:29 -0800
From: Kent Stewart <kstewart@owt.com>
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 10:01:08 -0800
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1
References: <20041113101925.GB70256@voodoo.oberon.net>
	<20041114003532.L60099@juana.isp.net.au>
	<20041113135821.GD70256@voodoo.oberon.net>
In-Reply-To: <20041113135821.GD70256@voodoo.oberon.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200411131001.08820.kstewart@owt.com>
cc: ports@freebsd.org
cc: Mark Russell <freebsd@mark.net.au>
cc: Kirill Ponomarew <krion@voodoo.oberon.net>
Subject: Re: HEADSUP: INDEX[-5] files were removed from CVS.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 18:01:35 -0000

On Saturday 13 November 2004 05:58 am, Kirill Ponomarew wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 12:39:15AM +1100, Mark Russell wrote:
> > please back this out, it breaks things, I've never found an out of date
> > index to be a problem, now not havign an index is causing problems, also
> > the extra bandwidth for fetch index is a hassle.
>
> What things did it break ?  If you want to save your bandwidth, you
> can use "make index" in /usr/ports/.
>

If someone would commit ports/73612, we would have a fast generator like 
portindex back :).

Kent

-- 
Kent Stewart
Richland, WA

http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html