From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Aug 13 22:45:17 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 2F74F16A4E0; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 22:45:17 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from satie.private.org (YahooBB219196184076.bbtec.net
	[219.196.184.76])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 9600443D41; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 22:45:16 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from chat95@mac.com)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by satie.private.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i7DMibXG078451;
	Sat, 14 Aug 2004 07:44:38 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from chat95@mac.com)
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 07:44:37 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <20040814.074437.608033351.chat95@mac.com>
To: freebsd@chillt.de
From: NAKATA Maho <chat95@mac.com>
In-Reply-To: <411C7C13.7040101@chillt.de>
References: <411B7593.5050907@chillt.de>
	<20040813.164228.730632177.chat95@mac.com>
	<411C7C13.7040101@chillt.de>
Organization: private
X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on XEmacs 21.4.14 (Reasonable Discussion)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: truckman@FreeBSD.org
cc: openoffice@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: openoffice-1.1 build more broken than usual on 5.2-CURRENT
X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD <freebsd-openoffice.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-openoffice>,
	<mailto:freebsd-openoffice-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-openoffice>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-openoffice-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-openoffice>,
	<mailto:freebsd-openoffice-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 22:45:17 -0000

In Message-ID: <411C7C13.7040101@chillt.de> 
Bartosz Fabianowski <freebsd@chillt.de> wrote:

> Second, even if you pass CFLAGS inside a variable CFLAGS_FROM_MAIN, the 
> sub port won't use them. It does not know about the variable and thus 
> doesn't use it.

I agree.

> And finally, if you really want to pass CFLAGS down to the sub port, 
> would MAKE_ENV not be a better way of doing things?

Better! thank you for you hint!
--nakata maho