From owner-cvs-ports  Sun Jun 15 04:14:14 1997
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id EAA06045
          for cvs-ports-outgoing; Sun, 15 Jun 1997 04:14:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dfw-ix15.ix.netcom.com (dfw-ix15.ix.netcom.com [206.214.98.15])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id EAA06040;
          Sun, 15 Jun 1997 04:14:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from smap@localhost)
          by dfw-ix15.ix.netcom.com (8.8.4/8.8.4)
	  id GAA09553; Sun, 15 Jun 1997 06:13:39 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from sjx-ca83-01.ix.netcom.com(207.94.112.97) by dfw-ix15.ix.netcom.com via smap (V1.3)
	id sma009542; Sun Jun 15 06:13:25 1997
Received: (from asami@localhost) by blimp.mimi.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) id EAA04816; Sun, 15 Jun 1997 04:13:12 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 1997 04:13:12 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199706151113.EAA04816@blimp.mimi.com>
To: fenner@parc.xerox.com
CC: cvs-all@freebsd.org, cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-ports@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <97Jun14.114823pdt.177512@crevenia.parc.xerox.com> (message from Bill Fenner on Sat, 14 Jun 1997 11:48:15 PDT)
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/print/ghostscript5 ...
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-cvs-ports@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * (But this does raise the question of why doesn't ghostview depend on
 * ghostscript?)

Which version? :)

People complained about the ghostview package pulling in an unwanted
version of ghostscript, so the dependency was removed.  Same for gv.

Satoshi