From owner-freebsd-current Sat Mar 24 2: 6: 2 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from gratis.grondar.za (grouter.grondar.za [196.7.18.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8947937B719; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 02:05:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.za) Received: from grondar.za (root@gratis.grondar.za [196.7.18.133]) by gratis.grondar.za (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2OA5if62456; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 12:05:47 +0200 (SAST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.za) Message-Id: <200103241005.f2OA5if62456@gratis.grondar.za> To: Stefan Esser Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Whatever happened to CTM? References: <20010324094149.A1185@StefanEsser.FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20010324094149.A1185@StefanEsser.FreeBSD.org> ; from Stefan Esser "Sat, 24 Mar 2001 09:41:49 +0100." Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 12:06:54 +0200 From: Mark Murray Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Anyway: If CTM was to ever be given up (it's good to read, that Ulf will > get his CTM box connected again, soon), then there should be a alternate > access method, that works through tightly configured firewalls. And CVsup > via SSL might be a good candidate ... Hmm. Look at sslproxy and sslwrap in the ports. They may just work for you. It shouldn't be too difficult to set up the other side - after all, there is a need :-) M -- Mark Murray Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message