From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 14 19:12:09 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE7E737B401 for ; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 19:12:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usw2.natel.net (2b.bz [209.152.117.190]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E1F5943F75 for ; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 19:12:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from WD@US-Webmasters.com) Received: (qmail 56552 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2003 02:12:07 -0000 Received: from batv-01-023.dialup.netins.net (HELO xyz.US-Webmasters.com) (216.248.109.24) by us-webmasters.com with SMTP; 15 Jul 2003 02:12:07 -0000 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20030714201034.00a742b0@209.152.117.178> X-Sender: wd@209.152.117.178 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 20:11:22 -0500 To: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.org From: "W. D." In-Reply-To: <200307141924.15522.dkelly@HiWAAY.net> References: <20030714231604.GA27924@teddy.fas.com> <20030714231604.GA27924@teddy.fas.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Seting the hardware clock X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 02:12:10 -0000 At 19:24 7/14/2003, David Kelly, wrote: >Another thing we saw with Soekris and FreeBSD 4.x was that FreeBSD wrote=20 >Sunday as 0 but would accept 0 or 7 on read, Soekris clock hardware was=20 >happy with 0, but BIOS demanded 7 else it assumed the clock was corrupt=20 >and reset its time to Jan 1, 1980. This only mattered if you rebooted=20 >on Sunday. Its a 2 byte patch to FreeBSD 4.x, already included in 5.x. Where would one find this 2 byte patch for 4.7? Start Here to Find It Fast!=99 -> http://www.US-Webmasters.com/best-start-pa= ge/