From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Oct 14 18:28:41 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00FCEE2931A for ; Sat, 14 Oct 2017 18:28:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x243.google.com (mail-wm0-x243.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93C0577BB7 for ; Sat, 14 Oct 2017 18:28:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x243.google.com with SMTP id f4so27017229wme.0 for ; Sat, 14 Oct 2017 11:28:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ru3fdwxoGkeXT6i86jFAAE0fGRQgAgfyHVFRFNq7sAU=; b=fTmiivMBCTPpxo4khtCvxLW7zF9yB1AuEYdBxNYqfphTnR3BBlhrhB1pt0eiI8W5Qw 2uDz/l0TO14c0a61IZU0ubJJthfyeGzjxwX3ryxwReGHrImauvYvJrGqTCwVRtB3fqoH CQKyT5TyyUX0EXoH3oWOkNXCf0UTSldk7v3ciXVCZx8p7cwXpz8O9XBH/+e+KdR1IU24 GoldbGFP5/5LrBM6fVi7HDbDDNEl5CKdYQpBI/0Pu3Tl9S5ynJkr1bIbUZXj27Y7HIV2 tsMdkU8RdLMvmcp8JaFt0S6KcHBm8dBfR37jJ+Ynmk5EutyGqjvGTpBIxDAsn+Ij00w3 ZNdQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaUrZVmLDoAKluricV569ksCJenJmqyfZc6ur1A2lGORtVBUJIZk xaJyxoO3ZZ+a6Tsz/hXQVUFoqw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+RCRSgedd/TbxmVJ4bKmDnbMA7y8HwI9J5qCJpMvizQHRSgYb/TbNVGt/Z0PcbjL7P5S+nBQQ== X-Received: by 10.28.54.154 with SMTP id y26mr4439009wmh.15.1508005718706; Sat, 14 Oct 2017 11:28:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com ([81.17.24.158]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j13sm1636280wrb.18.2017.10.14.11.28.36 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sat, 14 Oct 2017 11:28:37 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2017 19:28:33 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: forcing new dynamic ip address Message-ID: <20171014192833.4c38649e@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <9E9FD41B-997F-4506-AAF7-C70F038BBF70@fjl.co.uk> References: <59DA19E8.5000602@gmail.com> <7531e98e-6910-0853-b4e2-a3fe92bfb694@rail.eu.org> <9E9FD41B-997F-4506-AAF7-C70F038BBF70@fjl.co.uk> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.15.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; amd64-portbld-freebsd11.1) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2017 18:28:41 -0000 On Fri, 13 Oct 2017 12:18:55 +0100 Frank Leonhardt (m) wrote: > On 8 October 2017 13:37:30 BST, Erwan David wrote: > >DHCP protocol states > > > Hate to be a pendent, but it may not be a DHCP server giving you the > IP address unless you're running Ethernet. In some parts of the world > people do run PPPoE instead of ATM, so it might conceivability work > this way. AFAIK PPPoE uses LCP. I would have thought the distinction would be between PPP variants using LCP and bridging using DHCP. > Most DSL use LCP to configure IP address IME. Once you go > past the modem socket it doesn't look like Kansas any more.