From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org  Tue Aug 15 17:21:17 2017
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2A2FDE0EB1
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Tue, 15 Aug 2017 17:21:17 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0CA2779B8
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 17:21:17 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v7FHLHMG072496
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 17:21:17 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 210170] www/uwsgi: Add Emperor mode support
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 17:21:18 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages
X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s)
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me
X-Bugzilla-Who: ultima@freebsd.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: Open
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback+
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-210170-13-c3u29TG1px@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-210170-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-210170-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 17:21:17 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D210170

--- Comment #13 from Richard Gallamore <ultima@freebsd.org> ---
(In reply to David Wahlund from comment #12)
As long as you test the socket being 165:165 and you don't think it will br=
eak
anything for users upgrading without interaction it should be okay. We need=
 to
add update note otherwise. I just need to know which it is.

Uwsgi_flags should be okay then. I was reading the man rc.subr variable for=
 it,
if this is what the docs suggest though then it is fine.


Nevermind about the last point. I just ran a test to verify my statement an=
d it
was incorrect. It works, I usually add quotes at start and end of variable
assignments which is what I thought would cause issues.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=