Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 17:21:18 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 210170] www/uwsgi: Add Emperor mode support Message-ID: <bug-210170-13-c3u29TG1px@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-210170-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-210170-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D210170 --- Comment #13 from Richard Gallamore <ultima@freebsd.org> --- (In reply to David Wahlund from comment #12) As long as you test the socket being 165:165 and you don't think it will br= eak anything for users upgrading without interaction it should be okay. We need= to add update note otherwise. I just need to know which it is. Uwsgi_flags should be okay then. I was reading the man rc.subr variable for= it, if this is what the docs suggest though then it is fine. Nevermind about the last point. I just ran a test to verify my statement an= d it was incorrect. It works, I usually add quotes at start and end of variable assignments which is what I thought would cause issues. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-210170-13-c3u29TG1px>