From owner-freebsd-current Fri May 24 12:49:27 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from ip68-4-88-233.oc.oc.cox.net (ip68-4-88-233.oc.oc.cox.net [68.4.88.233]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D879037B40A for ; Fri, 24 May 2002 12:49:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ip68-4-88-233.oc.oc.cox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ip68-4-88-233.oc.oc.cox.net (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g4OJpPbE093367 for ; Fri, 24 May 2002 12:51:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from housel@acm.org) Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 12:51:25 -0700 Message-ID: From: housel@acm.org (Peter S. Housel) To: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Please test PAUSE on non-Intel processors In-Reply-To: References: User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.8.1 (Something) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2 (i386--freebsd) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At Fri, 24 May 2002 10:25:53 -0400 (EDT), John Baldwin wrote: > Hey gang, although Intel's document seems to claim that they tested > proper operation of pause I'd like people with non-Intel processors > to verify that it actually works. It works fine on my Transmeta Crusoe TM5600, about as non-intel as you can get: Testing PAUSE instruction: Register esp changed: 0xbfbffa0c -> 0xbfbff9d0 dmesg excerpt: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #0: Sun Apr 28 16:02:43 GMT 2002 root@nomad:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/NOMAD CPU: Transmeta(tm) Crusoe(tm) Processor TM5600 (595.50-MHz 586-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineTMx86" Id = 0x543 real memory = 184483840 (180160K bytes) avail memory = 174391296 (170304K bytes) -Peter- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message