Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1999 16:58:07 -0500 From: Shawn Leas <sleas@ixion.honeywell.com> To: Doug White <dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu> Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Annoyance, gripe, whatever Message-ID: <19990420165806.A13395@ixion.honeywell.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.03.9904201436500.1514-100000@resnet.uoregon.edu>; from Doug White on Tue, Apr 20, 1999 at 02:37:17PM -0700 References: <19990420162741.A10204@ixion.honeywell.com> <Pine.BSF.4.03.9904201436500.1514-100000@resnet.uoregon.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Apr 20, 1999 at 02:37:17PM -0700, Doug White wrote: > > Failing builds aren't normal, but the -current tree has unusual bootstrap > requirements. Failing builds I can handle, but kill -STOP stopped the make processes, but then -CONTing the make processes made them quietly give up. The build would have succeeded. I was just wondering about the signal handling of make, or, if it might be something else. I thought make would simply resume where it was STOPped when I CONTed it. -- Shawn <=========== America Held Hostage ===========> Day 2281 for the poor and the middle class. Day 2300 for the rich and the dead. 641 days remaining in the Raw Deal. <============================================> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990420165806.A13395>