From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Apr 20 15: 1:11 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from ixion.honeywell.com (ixion.honeywell.com [129.30.4.80]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8655815254 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 1999 15:00:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sleas@ixion.honeywell.com) Received: by ixion.honeywell.com (1.40.112.8/16.2) id AA134535487; Tue, 20 Apr 1999 16:58:07 -0500 Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1999 16:58:07 -0500 From: Shawn Leas To: Doug White Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Annoyance, gripe, whatever Message-Id: <19990420165806.A13395@ixion.honeywell.com> References: <19990420162741.A10204@ixion.honeywell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3i In-Reply-To: ; from Doug White on Tue, Apr 20, 1999 at 02:37:17PM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Apr 20, 1999 at 02:37:17PM -0700, Doug White wrote: > > Failing builds aren't normal, but the -current tree has unusual bootstrap > requirements. Failing builds I can handle, but kill -STOP stopped the make processes, but then -CONTing the make processes made them quietly give up. The build would have succeeded. I was just wondering about the signal handling of make, or, if it might be something else. I thought make would simply resume where it was STOPped when I CONTed it. -- Shawn <=========== America Held Hostage ===========> Day 2281 for the poor and the middle class. Day 2300 for the rich and the dead. 641 days remaining in the Raw Deal. <============================================> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message