From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 20:46:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 959F216A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:46:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from mail.ipt.ru (mail.ipt.ru [80.253.10.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A64543D45 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:46:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from doc.sem.ipt.ru ([192.168.12.1] helo=srv.sem.ipt.ru) by mail.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1FACV5-0000bY-Ub; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 23:46:48 +0300 Received: from bsam by srv.sem.ipt.ru with local (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FACTQ-0003F6-Ox; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 23:45:04 +0300 To: Rainer =?iso-8859-1?Q?Gr=F6=DFlinger?= References: <200602171829.04459.rainer.groesslinger@gmx.net> <20060217181022.GB16284@soaustin.net> <43F62F36.9060600@gmx.net> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 23:45:04 +0300 In-Reply-To: <43F62F36.9060600@gmx.net> (Rainer =?iso-8859-1?Q?Gr=F6=DFlin?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?ger's?= message of "Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:16:54 +0100") Message-ID: <50976399@srv.sem.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: lang/{*pnet*, treecc, libjit} update request X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:46:49 -0000 On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:16:54 +0100 Rainer Gr=F6=DFlinger wrote: > The ports are straight forward and all the checks etc. in them are for > specific architectures I can't test (like sparc64) - so I don't think > I'd be any help as it would only be a simple version bump + > architecture testing for those things which are currently not > enabled. Someone with access to those architectures and commit access > to the ports needs to look at this. All I could do is submit a diff > with one change: version number ;-) Rainer, you are wrong here. You may do the main work at your favourite platform: o fetch new files; o create new distinfo; o update Makefile accordingly; o test old patches (maybe write new); o edit pkg-plist file; o do build/install/deinstall/package testing; o create patch and send-pr it. And at last a committer will check the patch on other platforms. But it were _you_ who did the main work! If you have quiestions on that (well, not very easy) way, you may ask them here. Somebody will help you. It is a way how FreeBSD is going on. > Mark Linimon wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 06:29:04PM +0100, Rainer Gr=F6=DFlinger wrote: > >> Would be cool if someone could take care of these packages. > > If you're using them, you are currently the most logical choice :-) WBR --=20 Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet Service Provider