Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 11:33:46 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Who should really be using libbsdxml? Message-ID: <20131204103346.GS27759@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <20131204082331.GV14900@kiwi.coupleofllamas.com> References: <20131204082331.GV14900@kiwi.coupleofllamas.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--RvrrZ8vH9xW05bsQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 12:23:31AM -0800, R. Tyler Croy wrote: >=20 > I'm working on a daemon for FreeBSD specifically, which I hope to one day= merge > into the base system, but first is going to live in ports for some amount= of > time. >=20 > Does it make sense for me to even bother using libbsdxml right now, or sh= ould I > just reference and link against a ports-installed libexpat? Switching to libbsdxml would be easy if it one day goes into base, but for = now keep using libexpat, libbsdxml is not intended to be used outside of base. Even pkg(8) now uses a bundled version of expat to avoid using libbsdxml regards, Bapt --RvrrZ8vH9xW05bsQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlKfBQoACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Eym3QCePgZY92/sw0cABRCTFmPicToY voEAn21clEWJHDoCwgRiMNtWpGPK9vTu =cB3L -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --RvrrZ8vH9xW05bsQ--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20131204103346.GS27759>