Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 11:33:46 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Who should really be using libbsdxml? Message-ID: <20131204103346.GS27759@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <20131204082331.GV14900@kiwi.coupleofllamas.com> References: <20131204082331.GV14900@kiwi.coupleofllamas.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 12:23:31AM -0800, R. Tyler Croy wrote: > > I'm working on a daemon for FreeBSD specifically, which I hope to one day merge > into the base system, but first is going to live in ports for some amount of > time. > > Does it make sense for me to even bother using libbsdxml right now, or should I > just reference and link against a ports-installed libexpat? Switching to libbsdxml would be easy if it one day goes into base, but for now keep using libexpat, libbsdxml is not intended to be used outside of base. Even pkg(8) now uses a bundled version of expat to avoid using libbsdxml regards, Bapt [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlKfBQoACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Eym3QCePgZY92/sw0cABRCTFmPicToY voEAn21clEWJHDoCwgRiMNtWpGPK9vTu =cB3L -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20131204103346.GS27759>