From owner-freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 13 00:00:41 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-usb@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACE6A16A4CE for ; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 00:00:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A78343D49 for ; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 00:00:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j3D00fdu024115 for ; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 00:00:41 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j3D00f0P024114; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 00:00:41 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 00:00:41 GMT Message-Id: <200504130000.j3D00f0P024114@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.org From: Ian Dowse Subject: Re: usb/79436: Panic: ohci_abort_xfer: not in process context X-BeenThere: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Ian Dowse List-Id: FreeBSD support for USB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 00:00:41 -0000 The following reply was made to PR usb/79436; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Ian Dowse To: Anthony Ginepro Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: usb/79436: Panic: ohci_abort_xfer: not in process context Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 00:58:22 +0100 In message <1113326117.980.4.camel@renaissance.homeip.net>, Anthony Ginepro wri tes: >Hi Ian, > >I tried ucom.c patch alone first however copying it from evolution broke >it then having to go to work fast I patched both usbdi.c and ucom.c (got >from mutt this time). > >Since then I don't have a panic anymore, I still have to retry palm >synchronization. > >Do you need me retrying to only patch ucom.c ? Thanks for trying it. Yes, if possible, could you test with just the ucom.c patch? I've committed the ucom.c patch to RELENG_5 now, so it would be good to get confirmation that the usbdi.c patch is necessary. I'm reluctant to commit the usbdi.c patch without a considerable amount of testing, as it is a significant though subtle change to the ordering of USB transfer completion, so it might break some configurations. Ian