From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 29 14:59:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5AA1106564A for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 14:59:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hugo@barafranca.com) Received: from mail.barafranca.com (mail.barafranca.com [67.213.67.47]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63EC08FC1C for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 14:59:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [172.16.100.24]) by mail.barafranca.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97442A54; Sun, 29 May 2011 14:59:23 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at barafranca.com Received: from mail.barafranca.com ([172.16.100.24]) by localhost (mail.barafranca.com [172.16.100.24]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vlLp6IeC1Abi; Sun, 29 May 2011 14:58:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.1] (a94-132-1-126.cpe.netcabo.pt [94.132.1.126]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.barafranca.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CA8ACA4A; Sun, 29 May 2011 14:58:44 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4DE25F25.6090309@barafranca.com> Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 15:58:45 +0100 From: Hugo Silva User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org References: <4DDBB66F.6030608@barafranca.com> <4DDC11AA.6030106@barafranca.com> <4DDD2C41.2000302@barafranca.com> <4DE227B5.6000903@barafranca.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: xn_txeof: WARNING: response is -1! X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 14:59:24 -0000 On 05/29/11 14:11, K. Macy wrote: > Just to verify, other guests (e.g. Linux || NetBSD) don't exhibit this > problems? It sounds almost as if xend isn't configuring the domain > properly. > Hello, I'm not sure about Linux but a NetBSD 5.1 PV domU works fine. Others are running Linux PV on NetBSD afaik. Maybe http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=143340 is the same issue? (it may be of interest to note that pr is still open - maybe the patch does work and one less pr to worry about :)) I do get "packet corrupt" until txc and rxc are disabled, with both off then the xn_txeof warning is logged and the ssh connection seems to hang. Couldn't apply the patch in the link, the text appears to be mangled. I tried to correct it, but no luck.