Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 11:23:37 -0700 From: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> To: chuck <enshow@gmail.com> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.0BETA2 ndis(4) WPA-PSK Message-ID: <20050808182337.GB1936@odin.ac.hmc.edu> In-Reply-To: <3c3ce1970508071029797ae723@mail.gmail.com> References: <3c3ce1970508071029797ae723@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--jq0ap7NbKX2Kqbes Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 01:29:13PM -0400, chuck wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I've just install the 6.0Beta2 to test the new WPA-PSK functionality. > Regarding this, > I have 2 questions. >=20 > 1) The signal strength is quite different between drivers. (ath vs ndis). > - The signal is much stronger when I use the ndis drivers. Why ? Most likely they are reporting a value with different units. It's quite likely that ndis(4) isn't mapping the values correctly to what the 80211 framework expects. It's also possible they are programming the card differently and thus the signal is actually different, but that seems less likely. Unless ath is actually performing worse, I'd suggest ignoring it. > 2) The wpa-psk works perfectly when I use the ath(4) driver and it doesn'= t work > with the ndis(4) drivers. When I use wpa_supplicant I get this (from d= mesg) ndis(4) doesn't support the features required for wpa_supplicant to work. -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --jq0ap7NbKX2Kqbes Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFC96MoXY6L6fI4GtQRAoxJAJ0YvBHCQE0oG+rf6cJZ+s1O87ltoQCfSuC2 ThIDAyuql47odNd98qR/gUc= =4muj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jq0ap7NbKX2Kqbes--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050808182337.GB1936>