From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 4 07:30:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F69B16A404 for ; Thu, 4 May 2006 07:30:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D447043D46 for ; Thu, 4 May 2006 07:30:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k447UNSv037474 for ; Thu, 4 May 2006 07:30:23 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k447UNXJ037473; Thu, 4 May 2006 07:30:23 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 07:30:23 GMT Message-Id: <200605040730.k447UNXJ037473@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org From: Cheng-Lung Sung Cc: Subject: Re: docs/96639: [patch] suggestion to committer's guide that should have a description about remove ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Cheng-Lung Sung List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 07:30:24 -0000 The following reply was made to PR docs/96639; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Cheng-Lung Sung To: Vasil Dimov Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, clsung@freebsd.org, erwin@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/96639: [patch] suggestion to committer's guide that should have a description about remove ports Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 15:29:17 +0800 --/04w6evG8XlLl3ft Content-Type: text/plain; charset=big5 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi,=20 Thank to your suggestions. I made some modification, and the patch now is placed at http://people.freebsd.org/~clsung/patch-committers-guide_v2 If you are free can you help me review that? Thanks, On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 12:47:02PM +0300, Vasil Dimov wrote: > "Make sure there is no dependency on the port in the ports colloection" > This is too superficial, I would suggest something like: >=20 > Make sure there is no dependency on the port in the ports collection: > * The only line in a recent INDEX file, containing port's PKGNAME should > be port's own line. > * No other ports should contain any references to port's directory or > PKGNAME in their Makefiles >=20 > (feel free to correct the englicsh, I hope you get the meaning) --=20 Cheng-Lung Sung - clsung@ --/04w6evG8XlLl3ft Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEWa1M+AeJ85Vui8ERAjZyAJ9aGmR9dEPouI2dYIfSX1aEiX//SwCfcHPF BghJPvryL2UcHU6q/GWTDoI= =vlS6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/04w6evG8XlLl3ft--