From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 5 22:41:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7851D16A41C for ; Tue, 5 Jul 2005 22:41:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.village.org (vc4-2-0-87.dsl.netrack.net [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37D5C43D45 for ; Tue, 5 Jul 2005 22:41:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j65Mfbf8076756; Tue, 5 Jul 2005 16:41:37 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 16:41:35 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20050705.164135.12222348.imp@bsdimp.com> To: rik@cronyx.ru From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <42CAAFCB.2080207@cronyx.ru> References: <42C57523.4050302@cronyx.ru> <20050701.121826.56566740.imp@bsdimp.com> <42CAAFCB.2080207@cronyx.ru> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BUS infrastructure problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 22:41:46 -0000 In message: <42CAAFCB.2080207@cronyx.ru> Roman Kurakin writes: : Hi, : : M. Warner Losh wrote: : : >In message: <42C57523.4050302@cronyx.ru> : > Roman Kurakin writes: : >: I observe the followin strange behaviour with current: with some very : >: high probability after indentify callback I didn't get a probe callback. I : >: didn't find yet anything that could tell me why I see this. All function : >: return me that all operations was successful. : >: : >: PS. This driver is cx(4) and I am currently try to debug it in async mode : >: (I get strange panics while its work if I didn't get into situation with : >: probe()). : >: : >: Any ideas? : > : >I'll be happy to help you with this. : > : > : The last place I get to is the call of DEVICE_PROBE macro. : But I do not see the call of my function. : There is other thing, it seems that probability highly increases : if the system reboots after panic and needs filesystem check. : : This is all information I have now. I use printf as a primary : debug technic so I need to think how to move farther. : : Ideas? That sounds really weird. Add a Debugger() call and see if you wind up in the debugger. Warner