From owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 21 18:39:05 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1896616A4CE
	for <hubs@freebsd.org>; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 18:39:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from luna.rtfmconsult.com (luna.rtfmconsult.com [202.83.72.190])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0F7043D5C
	for <hubs@freebsd.org>; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 18:39:03 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from jason@rtfmconsult.com)
Received: by luna.rtfmconsult.com (Postfix, from userid 42)
	id 8624648F3F; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 12:39:02 +1000 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by luna.rtfmconsult.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 7E9DA52D17; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 12:39:02 +1000 (EST)
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 12:39:02 +1000 (EST)
From: jason andrade <jason@rtfmconsult.com>
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jo=E3o_Carlos_Mendes_Lu=EDs?= <jonny@jonny.eng.br>
In-Reply-To: <400F3562.7040904@jonny.eng.br>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.50.0401221235400.4689-100000@luna.rtfmconsult.com>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.50.0401221141180.4689-100000@luna.rtfmconsult.com>
 <400F3562.7040904@jonny.eng.br>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
cc: hubs@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: broken packages directory/link for amd64 freebsd 5.1 release ?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: FreeBSD Distributions Hubs: mail sup ftp <freebsd-hubs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hubs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hubs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hubs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hubs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hubs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hubs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 02:39:05 -0000

On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, [ISO-8859-1] Jo=E3o Carlos Mendes Lu=EDs wrote:

> 5.1?  IIRC, 5.1 did not have a amd64 port...

it's there on ftp-master.us

drwxrwxr-x        1024 2003/12/27 09:15:48 amd64/5.1-RELEASE

> And my copy of amd64 5.2-RELEASE seens to be correct.  I've rsynced from
> ftp-master.us

correct in what way ?

if i understood Kris correctly, no -RELEASE for any other architecture
should have a ports/ directory - they should all be symlinks back to
the i386/-RELEASE/ports/ directory as the contents are identical.

it is weird that each one has a different filesize though if they are
meant to be identical.

-bash-2.05b$ ls -la ../../../amd64/5.2-RELEASE/ports/
-rw-rw-r--    1 mirror   mirror   24398333 Jan 11 13:16 ports.tgz
-bash-2.05b$ ls -la ../../../i386/5.2-RELEASE/ports/
-rw-r--r--    1 mirror   mirror   24403986 Jan 11 14:32 ports.tgz
-bash-2.05b$ ls -la ../../../sparc64/5.2-RELEASE/ports/
-rw-r--r--    1 mirror   mirror   24408312 Jan 11 16:40 ports.tgz

regards,

-jason