From owner-freebsd-current Thu Dec 14 13: 3: 2 2000 From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 13:03:01 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5CF037B400; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 13:02:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id eBEL2ws87729; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 14:02:58 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id OAA50353; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 14:02:58 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <200012142102.OAA50353@harmony.village.org> To: John Baldwin Subject: Re: Cardbus woes Cc: current@FreeBSD.org, jon@FreeBSD.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 14 Dec 2000 12:47:51 PST." References: Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 14:02:58 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: imp@harmony.village.org Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG : http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/patches/pccbb.patch. I took a look a this patch, and saw nothing obviously wrong with it. Mike Smith has some uncommitted patches that might amke the resource issue better, but not completely if I'm reading them right (they are extensive, so I might not be). Justin Gibbs has also said that he's working on a rework of cardbus to factor things better. I don't think these patches will conflict with either of these efforts. Finally, can we talk about pccard/cardbus issues and changes in mobile@ rather than current@? Its charter covers this more closely. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message