From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Feb 17 11:14:40 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA28543 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Tue, 17 Feb 1998 11:14:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from nefertari.udd.htu.se (nefertari.udd.htu.se [193.10.201.51]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA28369 for ; Tue, 17 Feb 1998 11:13:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from f94jnh@student.udd.htu.se) Received: from b207nt9 (dos69.thnstud.htu.se [193.10.195.79]) by nefertari.udd.htu.se (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id TAA09652 for ; Tue, 17 Feb 1998 19:39:22 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <3.0.1.32.19980217192946.0092dbe0@student.udd.htu.se> X-Sender: f94jnh@student.udd.htu.se X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.1 (32) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 19:29:46 +0100 To: questions@FreeBSD.ORG From: Henrik Johansson Subject: FreeBSD desktop Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by hub.freebsd.org id LAA28391 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi I´m thinking of buying ver 2.2.5 on CDROM. I have previously tried both FreeBSD ver 2.1 and Red Hat Linux 4.1. For a curious "normal" user like myself I thougt the Linux´s X-desktop was easier to use because it seemed to be much more pre-configured than that of FreeBSD ver 2.1. (Both were different versions of Fvwm). Has FreeBSD caught up since? I´m not a programmer who likes to start off with manually editing configuration files here and there, but would like at least some applications readily available on the desktop......... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message