From owner-cvs-all  Fri May  4  7:51:46 2001
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from sj-msg-core-4.cisco.com (sj-msg-core-4.cisco.com [171.71.163.10])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 2F4D737B422; Fri,  4 May 2001 07:51:40 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from bmah@cisco.com)
Received: from bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com (bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com [171.70.84.42])
	by sj-msg-core-4.cisco.com (8.11.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id f44EpiQ21819;
	Fri, 4 May 2001 07:51:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from bmah@localhost)
	by bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com (8.11.3/8.11.1) id f44EpdG40951;
	Fri, 4 May 2001 07:51:39 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from bmah)
Message-Id: <200105041451.f44EpdG40951@bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.3.1 01/19/2001 with nmh-1.0.4
To: Brian Feldman <green@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/secure/lib/libssh Makefile src/secure/libexec/sftp-server Makefile src/secure/usr.bin Makefile src/secure/usr.bin/scp Makefile src/secure/usr.bin/sftp Makefile src/secure/usr.bin/ssh Makefile src/secure/usr.bin/ssh-add Makefile ... 
In-Reply-To: <200105040421.f444LQ237739@freefall.freebsd.org> 
References: <200105040421.f444LQ237739@freefall.freebsd.org>
Comments: In-reply-to Brian Feldman <green@FreeBSD.org>
   message dated "Thu, 03 May 2001 21:21:26 -0700."
From: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@FreeBSD.org>
Reply-To: bmah@FreeBSD.org
X-Face: g~c`.{#4q0"(V*b#g[i~rXgm*w;:nMfz%_RZLma)UgGN&=j`5vXoU^@n5<Pi&akO)o^8;[r
 %l(8ZHlbF`dD>v4:OO)c["!w)nD/!!~e4Sj7LiT'6*wZ83454H""lb{CC%T37O!!'S$S&D}sem7I[A
 2V%N&+
X-Image-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/Images/bmah-cisco-small.gif
X-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1679216682P";
	 micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Fri, 04 May 2001 07:51:38 -0700
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

--==_Exmh_1679216682P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

If memory serves me right, Brian Feldman wrote:

>   Follow the OpenSSH 2.9 upgrade with the infrastructure.  Two new
>   programs are now included: sftp(1) and ssh-keyscan(1).

According to the OpenSSH release announcement, protocol version 2 is 
now the default.  Does this hold true for the version we now have in 
the tree, and if so, is this worth an UPDATING note?

Here's the release notes entry I wrote...

  OpenSSH has been updated to version 2.9, which adds two new programs,
  sftp(1) and ssh-keyscan(1).  Among the various enhancements: The
  default protocol is now v2, rekeying of existing SSH sessions is now
  supported, and an experimental SOCKS4 proxy has been added to the
  ssh(1) client.

...which was mostly paraphrased from the release announcement.  
Any suggestions for improvements?

Thanks,

Bruce.



--==_Exmh_1679216682P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000

iD8DBQE68sH62MoxcVugUsMRArzPAJ4/QvyVXJP43rB8sfA2zpbHlHNBfACbBe4L
jM6u9wvG9C9Pg8DdvCJ3gNU=
=otCF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--==_Exmh_1679216682P--

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message