From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Aug 28 15:49:32 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from home.offwhite.net (home.offwhite.net [156.46.35.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78C9237B422 for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2000 15:49:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (brennan@localhost) by home.offwhite.net (8.9.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA35525; Mon, 28 Aug 2000 17:49:19 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 17:49:19 -0500 (CDT) From: BWS - Offwhite To: Alfred Perlstein Cc: Jim Jagielski , Steve Lewis , "James E. Pace" , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Scaling Apache? In-Reply-To: <20000828152538.F18862@fw.wintelcom.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Perhaps if enough of us send an email to Slashdot about this site they will link to it... get a Slashdot effect going on it all day. I would really like to see how it handle it. I would also like to know what hardware they happen to be using. I would also like to know what hardware they happen to be using. The OS is FreeBSD. http://www.netcraft.com/whats/?host=apache-two-oh.covalent.net&Examine=Wait.. Of course you can always install a benchmarking tool and hit that site with it and see how it performs. Still, you do not know the server hardware, which will influence all results. Brennan Stehling - web developer and sys admin projects: www.greasydaemon.com | www.onmilwaukee.com | www.sncalumni.com On Mon, 28 Aug 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * Jim Jagielski [000828 15:18] wrote: > > Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > > > > > > Apache was never designed to be "the fastest" web server around. > > > > We designed it with different groundrules. With 2.0, one major > > > > design consideration _was_ performance, and 2.0 does in fact kick > > > > some ass and allows preforking, process/thread and "pure thread" > > > > operation, which is good to have. > > > > > > I'll believe it when I see it. > > > > > > > http://apache-two-oh.covalent.net/ > > This doesn't seem to be under any considerable load. It's a good thing > that they're trying this new method, but I'd like to see it deployed on > something that shows its performance. Like say... slashdot. :) > > -Alfred > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message